Feature Requests

VRAM usage is difficult to manage, and failure to manage it effectively results in disruptive app crashes. An option to sort the list of players in an instance by highest VRAM usage would present already-available info in a more usable way. Players could quickly choose avatars to hide to save VRAM.

as title says, metadata is good for personal use but it can create lots of stalker scenarios when these types of people go snooping. Its a big cause for concern when it comes to social media and having your userID and Author name in the metadata can cause lots of unwarranted friend request from creeps. Please push out a toggle for it asap.

[ SUMMARY ] ・Please expose the local audio output latency (time from audio scheduled by the engine to sound at the user’s speakers/headphones) to Udon. ・With this value, world creators can apply a per-client offset to video playback so audio and video stay in sync on each device. [ PROBLEM ] ・Audio output latency varies widely by user (hardware, OS/driver, platform, buffer sizes). ・Udon currently cannot read that latency, so creators rely on manual sliders or fragile periodic seek/pause nudges. ・Result: noticeable desync during watch parties, karaoke, concerts, rhythm content, and story scenes. [ PROPOSAL (Udon API surface; read-only, local) ] ・float GetLocalAudioOutputLatencySeconds() Returns the estimated end-to-end local output latency in seconds (local only). ・(optional) double GetLocalDSPTime() Exposes local audio DSP time for precise scheduling. ・(optional) bool TryGetLocalAudioOutputLatency(out float seconds) Safe getter with failure fallback. ・(optional) Low-frequency refresh or change notification (approx. 1–2 Hz) if latency can vary at runtime. [ ADDITIONALLY HELPFUL (not required) ] ・int GetOutputSampleRate() ・void GetDSPBuffer(out int bufferSizeSamples, out int numBuffers) [ HOW CREATORS WOULD USE IT ] Read GetLocalAudioOutputLatencySeconds() on each client. When starting or resyncing video, apply that value as a local offset (small seek or short pause) so visual frames align to what the user actually hears. Keep existing network sync as is; this request enables only a local correction. [ KEY USE CASES ] ・Karaoke / lip-sync shows: align mouth movements and lyrics to the user’s real heard audio. ・Watch parties / cinemas: reduce clap-test drift between audio and video. ・Rhythm / DJ / club worlds: visuals land on beat for each attendee. ・Cutscenes / story events: tighter A/V cohesion improves immersion. [ EXPECTED BEHAVIOR AND CONSTRAINTS ] ・Read-only numeric data; no privacy issues. ・Local-only value; creators implement their own offset logic. ・Reasonable update cadence (on change or around 1–2 Hz) is sufficient. ・If unsupported on a platform, return 0 or a defined “unsupported” state. [ WHY THIS MATTERS ] ・A single float (local audio output latency) lets creators deliver professional-grade A/V sync. ・It removes device-dependent guesswork and yields a consistent viewing/listening experience with a minimal, safe API. [ ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ] ・Udon can query a local audio output latency value (seconds). ・On typical hardware, creators can keep A/V sync within approximately ±20–40 ms using this value. ・Clear, documented fallback behavior when the value is unavailable.

VRCPlayerApi.GetPlayers(players) Right now when calling upon this function, it returns a array of players in an instance based off of their join order. However the order of the array can often be inconsistent between players in the instance. The array should be returning as a consistent array for everyone in an instance to avoid syncing problems. When systems are in place that rely on a player order that is consistent among every player it can cause problems and desync issues. Here is a world where an array that is returned by VRCPlayerApi.GetPlayers(players) is displayed in its default order. We are able to recreate an inconsistent array order by having people mass join. It very quickly shows an out of sync array order differing from person to person. The screenshots attached is of a same current session. https://vrchat.com/home/world/wrld_7e0dc0a0-4e79-4c13-bf0f-c571d9e84893 (This bug seems like it can also occur randomly as well. It as is hard to test for, but occurs enough to cause problems when it does happen.)

VRChat has a huge problem when it comes to publishing worlds - most of them are dying after a day, up to a week. There are quite a few factors causing this: 1) Unique worlds, that has been put a lot of time and effort, get flooded by "Social Slop" aka chill and hangout worlds, assetflip worlds that has taken straight from the asset's demo scene and so on. I'm not against these worlds, but it gets too boring to explore any of these worlds. 2) Worlds that do get lucky like stays on top for couple of days will still die eventually because the Popular worlds don't change that often. 3) There are not enough SDK updates that can improve quality of the world and being able to create never seen before things. And the list goes on. Without fixing these problems, VRChat can eventually die from being too repetitive and boring. That means no money going to the creators and most importantly, to your game. I have couple of ideas that could improve the quality of life on exploring worlds that can help you and us. First and most important thing I want to see is a "Follow a creator" system that allows you to see any updated or newly added worlds tab from your favourite world creators. Right now the only way to stay updated is through group announcements or other social media. I don't like joining every creator's server to keep myself updated. Second idea is to add Rating System to worlds that allows us to see if its worth going to these worlds and not be fooled by the thumbnail. Also this rating should be tied to how popular the world actually is and not just by the current players numbers. To avoid any "review bombing" this should be stricted to ranked users, just like how it is with uploading avatars and worlds. I believe this should be like a star rating system from 0-5 stars. Third idea is having World list added into groups. Let's say there is a collaboration with multiple creators and they want the world to be released as a group. For that, any revenue coming from visitors will be added to the group revenue. It's up to the group staff members how they split the credits, whoever gets the permission. Alternatively to the third idea is creating a favourite list for groups that want to recommend worlds. Fourth idea as it's not so important, being able to form "Group homes". Basically when you enter the game, you and your group members can all join in the same instance rather than starting at your own home world, alone. Please make me feel motivated again. Thank you for reading.

When visiting a busy event (like community meetup or a party) vrc likes to cram my vram and memory full until my pc starts having issues. It would be really nice to have a way to tell vrchat to leave a reserved amount of vram un-used for system resources. The moment this threshold gets reached (like 8GB out of 10GB) vrchat stops loading in additional avatars and shows them as diamonds. Currently we have some performance ranking/blocking but this method doesnt actively take your look at your available system resources. preventing the running out of vram should improve system stability and leave some space for tasks like livestreaming or in-game overlays. Similarly it would be nice to have a "aggressive" purge option that will instantly free up VRAM from hidden avatars completely (to the degree that it requires re-loading the avatar from disk or re-downloading them) Now there are cleanup routines that run for avatars from people who leave an instance but it would be nice to have a instant emergency button to purge vram to avoid a impending game or system crash

I have been around for awhile now in VRC and I have noticed a growing number of children under the ages of 9 and younger coming into the VRC worlds and harassing normal players. I would like to request to add a report under-aged player to the report forms to help deal with these problems and set an understanding that rules must be upheld. Otherwise They're just going to think they can do what ever they wish without consequences and sexual predators are going to attack these children. I have heard such cases in vr already to have happened from others I have met the youngest being 5 years of age.

Writing in VR is pretty great. You can whip up a diagram, communicate as a mute, or just draw your friends. It's so useful that people put pens in all kinds of random worlds and avatars... But wait, why should they need to do that? What if... we could just have pens _everywhere_? Please add a way to summon a synced pen that is not bound to a specific world or avatar. Some thought will need to be put into controlling abuse - eg pen muting options, and ways to disable it on specific worlds where it would detract from the experience (eg some horror worlds maybe?)

I know there are already multiple suggestions for this, but I still wish to see an in-game message system, one that uses text, voice, and/or video. Basically, I wish to see an in game discord. I know the last one sounds complicated, but I think it would be cool. I also wish for this to be cross-world if possible. That way, you could open the chat menu, click on a friend's name (I think this should be friend only chat, so as to prevent spam of course) and type out a text message, maybe make a voice recording, ring 'em up for a voice chat, and maybe make a video call, where they can see a headshot of your model with your local background (for example skyboxes in The Box), and you could talk that way. Having in game group chats would be cool too. I think this would benefit VR Users more than desktop, as desktop users can actually use discord for example, but as far as I am aware, VR Users cannot. Another reason I would like to have this messaging system is in case you wanna talk to someone who's in a private world real quick without interrupting something in that world or dragging them to yours. While video is definitely more complicated, and I would be satisfied without it, I wish for all three of these to be added to VR Chat so that users can more easily converse and talk in entirely different worlds.

With face tracking becoming more available it would be cool to be able to add another point to the face that can grasp objects and use face tracking to control it. This "tech" could allow for other arbitrary grab points but for now would be easier to visualize with said technique.