World/Udon Bugs & Feature Requests

It'd be helpful for world creators to know how many people are entering their world as well as how often users are coming back.

Please let us access the position of the name plate, to let us add world-specific UI icons to it. Currently, we can estimate the position of the name plate from the player's position. @bobystar discovered that: > it may have something to do with the avatar's main bounding box (all bone sizes are 1m): I've attached bobystar's screenshot. So a workaround might be to access the player's avatar bounding box - if we have access to that 🤔

StaticBatchingUtility.Combine sets up static batching for several objects at runtime. It offers the following advantages over marking objects as batching static in the editor: -Allows the performance advantages of static batching to be applied to objects generated at runtime. Since such objects don't exist in the editor, it's not possible to mark them as batching static. -Objects setup to be statically batched in this way can be moved by adjusting the transform of their associated staticBatchingRoot gameobject. This is useful for sets of objects that move together as a whole. For these reasons exposing StaticBatchingUtility.Combine would provide world creators with a useful tool for optimizing their worlds. https://docs.unity3d.com/2019.4/Documentation/ScriptReference/StaticBatchingUtility.html

Allow world creators the ability to moderate their OWN worlds and issue their OWN bans. I'm tired of seeing crashers and exploiters in my worlds and kicking them is nothing. I want the ability to ban certain individuals from my worlds. There is absolutely no harm in doing this. Who is it going to hurt? The exploiters and cheaters. What if world creators abuse it and ban people from THEIR OWN worlds? Well it's their fault their world fails to gather a population. What else will this do? Allow world creators to suit the needs of their wanted audience. it will also help take the stress off of the actually game moderators. Thank you, Lucifer MStar - Creator of 30+ worlds including church of marriages. P.S. Communicate more with your community on what you are doing about these crashers and exploiters and maybe the heat and stress will die down. Honestly this is the most annoying thing communication.

When adding [UdonBehaviourSyncMode(BehaviourSyncMode.NoVariableSync)] to an udon# class, It will just continue using the last setting. For example if you add [UdonBehaviourSyncMode(BehaviourSyncMode.Continuous)] and then compile, then change it to [UdonBehaviourSyncMode(BehaviourSyncMode.NoVariableSync)] and compile again, you get the expected behavior, and calling SendCustomNetworkEvent() works. If you then change it to [UdonBehaviourSyncMode(BehaviourSyncMode.None)] and compile, then change it to [UdonBehaviourSyncMode(BehaviourSyncMode.NoVariableSync)] and compile again It will continue to behave exactly as if it's still set to None. SendCustomNetworkEvent() does not work. This is on an object that doesn't have any other scripts on it. I haven't tested the case with other scripts. You can look at the debug inspector to confirm that this is what is happening. From the documentation: "NoVariableSync: Enforces that there are no synced variables on the behaviour, hides the sync mode selection dropdown, and allows you to use the behaviours on GameObjects that use either Manual or Continuous sync." It seems like the case where a script using NoVariableSync being used on an object that doesn't have another script on it may have been overlooked. Since I'm updating a script in a prefab I'm releasing from None to NoVariableSync because I want to use network events now, it's not going to work for anyone updating to the new version. I am forced to set it to Continuous. Does anyone know if it makes any difference to bandwidth usage?

It would be useful if we could get Terrain methods in Udon. Specifically, methods and properties in https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/TerrainData.html and https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/DetailPrototype.html .

This will allow maps to have a day night toggle (or change the lighting in other ways) while still using backed lighting.

When Player B calls SetOwner on an object owned by PlayerA, both Player A and B temporarily have ownership, and then Player B loses ownership. As for the synced value, there is no problem because the values will eventually be synced, but it means that there will be a section where routines that work based on the IsOwner result will run on both Player A and B. This can be confusing and complicate matters for those who design based on the assumption that ownership holders are unique. Therefore, I would like to see you provide a SetOwner that works asynchronously as before (e.g. SetOwnerAsync)

Log the bool "value" argument for InputUse. Click your mouse and release. Expected: receive "True" once, receive "False" once Actual:

Today, the most popular use case of the IVRCImageDownload is to share some picture with friends in VRChat. However, there is one big annoying behavior in IVRCImageDownload for this use case. That's 2048x2048 texture size limit. Therefore, I hope VRChat to have the feature that automatically scale the texture size down to 2048x2048. As described before, it's common to use IVRCImageDownload for sharing pictures with friends. There are several assets specifically designed for this use case such as Image Pad and ImageTablet . However, the 2048x2048 size limit is an annoying for this use case because today picture is likely to exceed this limit. For example, my iPhone 12 mini with default settings will take picture with 4032x3024 pixels and other modern smartphones also take high resolution image by default. In VRChat, I feel it’s common to choose take pictures in QHD, 4K, or 8K but none fits 2048x2048 limit. (FHD and HD fits 2048x2048 though we want to take high-quality pictures.) The texture downloaded with IVRCImageDownload become uncompressed RG, RGB or RGBA texture on the VRAM so It take huge VRAM. Therefore, I think it's reasonable to limit texture size on the VRAM. However, I think it's possible to resize texture down to 2048 off the main thread before loading to to the VRAM. That’s why I request VRChat to have the feature that automatically scale the texture size down to 2048x2048. 日本語要約 IVRCImageDownloadという Image Pad や ImageTablet のような画像を共有するためのアセットで使われている機能に対する要望です。 前述のタブレットではVRChatの制限により2048x2048より大きい画像を指定した場合にはエラーになりますが、エラーにする代わりに 2048x2048 以下に自動的にリサイズするオプションを追加してほしいという要求になります。 (技術的理由により2048x2048より大きい画像をそのまま表示するのは厳しいです) このオプションがあれば、Discordなどに上げた画像を共有するときにエラーが出て使えないという面倒事を減らせるようになります。