Preventing Nuisance Users from Entering an Instance / nuisance ユーザをインスタンスに入場させたくない
みゅーとん
Detecting and blocking or group banning nuisance users is a reactive approach to dealing with disruptive behavior. To prevent instances from being disturbed—whether they are opened for casual play or hosting events—we would like a proactive solution. Specifically, we request a feature that automatically prevents identified nuisance users from entering an instance.
nuisance ユーザを検知したときに Block もしくは Group Ban する作業は、荒らしに対する後手の対応です。通常遊ぶ目的や、イベントを開催する目的で開くインスタンスを荒らされたくないため、事前対応として自動的に入場を阻止するような機能がほしいです。
Log In
koyomin_kiki
Well then... I wonder if it's best to make a friend request to an account for the organizer, build an instance for friends only, and do events, and if it's a group, create an instance where only group members can enter, and the solution is
Tony_Lewis
As proposed creator guideline (https://hello.vrchat.com/creator-guidelines) under worlds (but also case of community guideline), instance moderation required to be “per person”, “at time”, “per Instance bases” as general rules.
As those are general stand points of how moderation handled, I don't think it would happen in the way you thought.
These are guidelines for the world, but since they are the same as community guidelines in terms of policy, it is written that they will be checked,
As a general rule, ban/kick things done by that user on the spot, so it is unlikely that it will be implemented in the desired way.
(Because automation is a prohibited direction)
For Group Instance, can you have your own rules and did what you want within whatever circumstances under guideline.
But general rules of “per person”, “at time”, “per instance bases” applied along with advance ban which can you add “per user” if you need to add in advance.
As for group instances, on the contrary, it is possible to decide your own rules and ban/kick them on the spot, since it is within the permitted range.
However, automating this is also prohibited.
As a general rule, ban/kick something that user did on the spot is a basic principle, but since it is possible to manually ban a specific user ahead of time, it's safe to use that.
Somehow that may be legal matter which makes this not happen is also possible so I don't think it happens in any mean.
It's my personal opinion, and there seems to be a legal issue, but it's not going to be a Mod Ban, but since I think they are positioned as people close to that, I think they will be banned soon if they are repeatedly reported.
YTJVDCM
Tony_Lewis
en:
I checked the creator and community guidelines, but as far as I can see, there are no terms of instance moderation limits.
The Worlds section of the creator guideline says that we may not use an Udon script based preemptive moderation system, but that statement seems to apply to world gimmicks, not a group.
In addition, the community guideline (and the Terms of Service) state that harmful or hateful activity is never allowed on VRChat.
Seeing this, I feel that to banning nuisance users who have caused problems for others is within the proper moderation of a group.
(In the first place, when using the moderation feature that provided by VRChat, it's usually not a problem).
ja:
Creator/Community Guidelinesを確認しましたが、インスタンスのモデレーションに関する明確な制約は記載されていませんでした。
Worldsの項にUdonを用いた先制的なモデレーションを不可とする趣旨の記載はありましたが、これはワールドギミックに対するもので、こちらもグループに適用されるものではありません。
更に、Community Guidelines(並びにToS)にはVRChatにおいて有害・憎悪的行為は一切許可されないとも記載されており、これらを見る限り、何らかの迷惑(有害)な行為を働いた証明でもあるnuisanceユーザーに対して、Groupへのアクションを禁止することは適切なモデレーションの範囲内であると考えます。
(何より、VRChat側が1機能として提供するモデレーション機能であれば、既存のモデレーション機能同様Guideline上問題になることはありません)
D
Docteh
Tony_Lewis I think it's okay to ask VRChat for things contrary to terms of service. It's a good cheap deal! Two for price of one. Asking for a thing, and that it be okay.