Keeping the default between 0.2m to 5.0m makes sense because any bigger than that can be obnoxious in worlds not designed for it, but world authors should be allowed to uncap scaling completely imo (or at least like 0.001m to 1,000m)

I can see why this is wished, though i personally would like to see a "personal limit" I may be able to set, so people outside said limit would be replaced by a "sign" or whatever telling me "hey, this user is currently scaled outside your set limit, show avatar to override your limit for this user" like we sort of do with download sizes and performance rank already. Why a "sign"? - a simple object would probably way easier to implement than a "normally scaled" fallback or similar. Someone being about 3-5m tall is fineish, personally i get annoyed and feel discomfort when someone is rocking an 8m tall avatar and constantly getting close/clipping into my view.

Hopefully we can see the limit go between 0.1~10m as the limit for users without Udon

I get that they have a majority Quest player population, but this really feels like forced Quest compatibility. If I'm primarily a PCVR player, why do I need to limit myself to Quest performance if me and my friends all have computers that can push better performance and interactions?

I would love to see this limit be set up in a way that makes it so anything outside of the .2m - 5m range would make it incompatible for Quest; but still usable and playable on PCVR. It would at least be a step in the right direction in terms of implementation.

TLDR: Sure, make it a limit for quest and mobile compatibility; but don't restrict EVERYONE for one platform. This feels like a blanket "fix" for something that wasn't broken. ESPECIALLY when other platforms have implemented scaling already

I would love to see the scaling limit go lower than 0.2m! That's still a whopping 7.8 inches tall!

At the moment I can get to 0.02m, with the "forced" near clipping option on and still can access my menu.

Make it so the forced near-clip automatically gets turned on if the game detects the player getting small enough where it might be an issue.

since they added the dynamic camera option to desktop, my menu would work just fine at my 0% scaler size which is super tiny, i have no problems playing the game with that option enabled as a tiny, so just remove the cap and just auto enable dynamic camera for whoever that goes under 0.2m size if they dont have it already enabled

Height effects performance rank? Performance rank system just keeps getting more useless, its based off like a 970 (nobody uses) anyway

agree

I agree, allows for more freedom in world where scrict sizes aren't needed while also allowing game worlds to say set a min-max height. Just fleshes out the feature more, and allows for more creativity. (I.e Kaiju games, toying with worlds as people are on them as if it's a miniature, etc.)

Also the limits feel pretty arbitrary