I was suspended for an avatar that has 0 toggles, not even gogo-loco, and when appealing the suspension and giving screenshots of the uploaded avi in unity showing there was nothing bad to it I was denied the appeal. While I was under suspension my vrc+ renewed. Please tell me that you understand the problem here? It shouldn't be legal to charge someone for vrc+ when they actively can't use the subscription and then denying a refund.